skip to content

Date: 25/08/2019 12:13:18 PM

Sager, Mark Jerome

CPSO#: 24794

Expired: Resigned from membership as of 26 Feb 2019
None as of 26 Feb 2019
Flag: Indicates a concern or additional information


Former Name: No Former Name

Gender: Male

Languages Spoken: English

Education:University of Ottawa, 1971

Practice Information

Primary Location of Practice
Practice Address Not Available

Medical Records Location

Address: Record Storage & Retrieval Services Inc. 111 St Regis S North York, ON M3J 1Y6 Phone: 1-888-563-3732 Fax: 1-877-398-5932
Date Received: 25 Feb 2019


Specialty Issued On Type
Family Medicine Effective: 01 Jul 1975 CFPC Specialist

Registration History

Action Issue Date
First certificate of registration issued: Postgraduate Education Certificate Effective: 18 Jun 1971
Transfer of class of registration to: Independent Practice Certificate Effective: 06 Jul 1972
Expired: Resigned from membership. Expiry: 26 Feb 2019

Previous Hearings Flag: indicates a concern or additional information

Committee: Discipline
Decision Date: 04 Mar 2019

On March 4, 2019, on the basis of a Statement of Agreed and Uncontested Facts, and Admission 
and Plea Of No Contest On Liability, the Discipline Committee found that Dr. Mark J. Sager 
committed an act of professional misconduct, in that he engaged in an act or omission relevant to 
the practice of medicine that, having regard to all the circumstances, would reasonably be 
regarded by members as disgraceful, dishonourable or unprofessional and failed to maintain the 
standard of practice of the profession. 

1.    Dr. Mark J. Sager is a 74-year-old general physician practicing in Toronto. Dr. Sager 
received his certificate of registration authorizing independent practice from the College of 
Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario (“the College”) on July 6, 1972. He has practiced general 
medicine since that time. 
Communication and Conduct with Patient A 
2.    Patient A was a patient of Dr. Sager’s for over 30 years. During this period she was 
treated for two occurrences of breast cancer. 
3.    During gynecological examinations, Patient A would often cover herself with her hand or 
her gown out of shyness. On these occasions, in order to perform the examinations, Dr. Sager 
would move Patient A’s hand or gown out of the way. He did so without asking Patient A to 
move her hand or gown herself, and without asking if he could move her hand or providing her 
with an adequate explanation. This left Patient A feeling humiliated. 
4.    The gynecological examinations were otherwise not inappropriate. 
5.    In early 2017, Patient A was scheduled for s gynecological surgery. Given her cancer 
history, she was anxious about the procedure. Her specialist instructed her to insert misoprostol 
vaginally prior to the surgery. 
6.    Patient A had an appointment with Dr. Sager in January 2017, prior to the surgery. At 
this appointment, Patient A asked Dr. Sager to explain medical terms in a lab report. Dr. Sager 
shouted at Patient A to “come over here, just come over here”. 
7.    At the same appointment, Patient A asked Dr. Sager to clarify the instructions she had 
received regarding the insertion of misoprostol. Patient A was unfamiliar with the drug and had 
questions about the prescription, as the literature accompanying the prescription indicated it was 
used for stomach ulcers and did not mention gynecological uses. 
8.    When Patient A asked for clarification regarding the use of misoprostol vaginally, Dr. 
Sager flew into a rage and said, “fucking take the pills when a doctor told you”, “fucking do 
what you’re told” and that she was “fucking annoying” him. He told her to take the pills and 
“stick those up your pussy”.  
9.    Patient A told Dr. Sager she had a right to ask questions and that she was intelligent 
enough to understand. Dr. Sager responded by saying, “You’re not that intelligent.” Patient A 
 repeated that she had a right to ask questions and get clarification, to which Dr. Sager responded, 
 “Ask your goddamn questions.” 
Communication with College Investigators 
 10.   Patient A complained to the College in July 2017 regarding Dr. Sager’s conduct. 
 11.   On August 11, 2017, College investigators attended unannounced at Dr. Sager’s office to 
 deliver the complaint notification letter. Dr. Sager was informed of the complaint and given the 
 opportunity to read the letter and comment. He was encouraged to contact the Canadian Medical 
 Protective Association (CMPA) and was informed he was not obliged to speak with the 
12.   After briefly reviewing the complaint letter, Dr. Sager said the following to the 
   -  He had treated Patient A for 25 years and she was a “nut case”. Dr. Sager stated several 
      times that Patient A was mentally unwell and had depression and cancer; 
   -  This was a “fairy tale”; it was “made up”; he didn’t “diddle” her; “diddling people” is not 
      his gig; 
   -  Asked if the incidents in the letter were before or after Patient A had her “breasts 
      mutilated”; and 
   -  Asked that investigators speak with Patient A to “trip her up” and find inconsistency in 
      her story. 
13.   Dr. Sager has advised the College that when he made these statements to the College 
investigators, he believed he was being accused of having touched Patient A inappropriately, 
which he did not do. 
Telephone Call to Patient A 
14.   In September 2017, Dr. Sager telephoned Patient A while she was at work and asked her 
to discuss her complaint to the College. Patient A said she could speak, but only for a moment as 
she was working on an urgent task.  
15.   During this telephone conversation, Dr. Sager asked what Patient A hoped to get out of 
the complaint. He told Patient A: he had not slept in a month; complained about his health 
problems; and told Patient A her complaint was causing him misery. During the call, Dr. Sager 
asked Patient A more than once to drop the complaint. He reminded Patient A that it was before 
Rosh Hashanah (the time for God’s forgiveness of sins) and suggested she should contact the 
College before Rosh Hashanah to withdraw her complaint. 

16.   Patient A told Dr. Sager several times during the call that she was at work and could not 
take a long, personal phone call, but Dr. Sager did not end the call and repeated his request that 
she drop her complaint. The phone call was difficult, awkward and emotional for Patient A. She 
felt manipulated by his reference to her religious faith. After the call she was shaken and 
embarrassed. Her employer was angry at the distraction of a long, personal call during work 
hours. At the end of the day, Patient A was fired from her job, which was her sole source of 
 Failure to Maintain the Standard of Practice of the Profession re: Record Keeping 
 17.   During the investigation, the College obtained Dr. Sager’s chart for Patient A. In 
 providing the chart, Dr. Sager acknowledged that his notes were not legible and provided a 
 transcription of the chart entries. 

 18.   The College retained Dr. Marcus Law to review Dr. Sager’s record keeping. Dr. Law 
 noted that of the 11 patient encounters he reviewed, there was not a single encounter note which 
was legible. Further, all encounter notes were missing pertinent information that other health 
professionals would need in order to understand the patient’s health issues. He concluded that 
Dr. Sager’s medical record keeping did not meet the standard of practice of the profession. 

19.   Dr. Sager admits the facts specified above, with the exception of paragraphs 8 and 16. Dr. 
 Sager admits that based on these facts, he engaged in professional misconduct by engaging in an 
 act or omission that, having regard to all the circumstances, would reasonably be regarded by 
 members as disgraceful, dishonourable or unprofessional and failed to maintain the standard of 

20.   Dr. Sager does not contest the facts set out in paragraphs 8 and 16. Dr. Sager does not 
contest that based on these facts, he engaged in professional misconduct by engaging in an act or 
omission that, having regard to all the circumstances, would reasonably be regarded by members 
as disgraceful, dishonourable or unprofessional. 

 Relevant College History  
 In June 2013, the Inquiries, Complaints and Reports Committee of the College (“ICRC”) issued 
 a decision requiring Dr. Mark Jerome Sager (“Dr. Sager”) to be cautioned and to complete a 
 specified continuing education or remediation program in relation to his record keeping. Dr. 
 Sager completed the University of Toronto Medical Record Keeping Course in October 2013. 
 Undertaking to The College 
 Dr. Mark Jerome Sager entered into an undertaking to the College on January 16, 2019, by 
 which he agreed to resign his certificate of registration effective February 26, 2019. He also 
 undertook not to apply or re-apply for registration as a physician in Ontario or any other 

 The Discipline Committee ordered that: 
    -  Dr. Sager appear before the panel to be reprimanded. 
    -  Dr. Sager pay costs to the College in the amount of $6,000. 00 within thirty (30) days of 
       the date of this Order. 

 Dr. Sager waived his right to an appeal under subsection 70(1) of the Code and the Committee 
 administered a public reprimand.

Decision: Download Full Decision (PDF)
Hearing Date(s): March 4, 2019 9:00 a.m. start time

Concerns Flag: indicates a concern or additional information

Source: Member
Active Date: February 26, 2019
Expiry Date:
Summary of the Undertaking given by Dr. Mark Jerome Sager to the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario, effective February 26, 2019:

A College investigation was conducted into whether Dr. Sager engaged in professional misconduct and/or is incompetent in his family medicine practice. In the face of the investigation, Dr. Sager resigned from the College, effective February 26, 2019, and has agreed never to apply or reapply for registration as a physician in Ontario or any other jurisdiction.
Download Full Document (PDF)